Discriminant function analysis was used to calculate classification formulae for predicting the sex of 98 adult grey-faced petrels (Pterodroma macroptera gouldi) at the start of incubation. Body weight, bill length, bill width, and bill depth all showed statistically significant sexual dimorphism. A classification formula based solely on bill measurements is impractical for sexing grey-faced petrels because of 37% error. The combination of body weight and bill depth in the formula proved useful, correctly classifying 92% of birds. This method provides a simple and reliable way of sexing grey-faced petrels in the field just after laying. Cloacal examination also allows definitive sexing at this time.
A re-examination of the moa genus Megalapteryx reveals that the two currently accepted species, M. didinus (Owen) and M. benhami Archey, do not differ in the shape of the bones. They represent small and large specimens in an unbroken size continuum. Specimens from northwest Nelson have a larger mean size than those in a sample from Takahe Valley, Fiordland. A series of 14C dates indicates that the largest ‘M. benhami‘ are all of Otiran derivation, whereas M. didinus bones are from Otiran and Holocene deposits. Therefore M. benhami is synonymised with the upland moa, M. didinus (Owen).
A colony of breeding snow petrels (Pagodroma nivea) in the Muhlig-Hofmann Mountains, Queen Maud Land, on the Antarctic continent was visited in January-February 1985. The birds were nesting under large boulders on the north-faced, ice-free hillside at Svarthamaren (71°53′ S, 5°10′ E), about 200 km from the open sea. The colony was roughly estimated to contain 500 pairs (Mehlum et al. 1985). Hatching took place in mid-January. The snow petrels at Svarthamaren were on average significantly smaller than those breeding elsewhere in the Antarctic. The irregular geographical distribution of breeding birds of varying size does not immediately provide any support for a sub-specific division of the species into one large and one small form, leaving the systematic and evolutionary status of the species unclear. It remains to be established whether inland breeding selects for relatively small birds.